Over the past nine years, Design Team students have completed over 250 design projects that provided solutions to clinical challenges. This teamwork has been the basis for many patents, licensing agreements, and start-up companies. Teams have access to the BME Department’s state-of-the-art Design Studios on both campuses, and resources to build and test early-stage ideas.
If you are interested in harnessing the collective skill, energy, and talent of our Design Teams, submit your design challenge for our next round of projects. If selected, a team of 5-8 undergraduate biomedical engineering students plus faculty will work with you and a group of medtech design and commercialization experts over the course of a year to develop solutions to your design challenge!
The option to become a project sponsor and/or join a project advisory committee
Access to technology assessments and business plans written by the student Design Team
Eligibility for funds from the CBID Technology Accelerator Fund
Modest departmental funding for prototyping
Access to CBID innovation, design, and business networking events
Involve accessible sponsors that can devote an average of one hour per week to working with the student team
Benefit from resources like experimental equipment, IRB support, and animal models
Give student teams access to clinical staff, colleagues, residents, and nurses
Fit within an appropriate scope for one year of undergraduate work
Involve a technical solution and a design component
Treat Design Team students as collaborative partners with some degree of independence
Important deadlines include:
* Projects are accepted all year for other design teams in the department as well. If the given timeline does not align with your schedule, you may still submit a challenge through this process.
A successful Design Team is made up of students, the project sponsor, and the associated Design Team faculty. In order to ensure that design projects can provide a fruitful experience for everyone involved, it is imperative that the structure of the course and the responsibilities associated with each role are understood. Mentors are asked to review the following documents:
The design challenge submission should focus on the main problem that needs to be solved, as opposed to providing a solution. Additionally, it should outline the relevant background information needed to contextualize the problem. Providing key failure points in the current clinical pathway will facilitate an understanding of the problem. Keep in mind that student teams will be using this submission as a reference while selecting a project.
10-15% of preventable deaths in the U.S. army occur due to airway obstruction from maxillofacial trauma. The key lifesaving procedure in these severe trauma cases is a cricothyrotomy, where an emergency surgical airway (ESA) is opened in the cricothyroid membrane (CTM) of the neck. 68W combat medics are trained on cricothyrotomy, but previous data has shown a failure rate of 33%. The key failure points are:
Lack of anatomical knowledge and recent training; failure to locate CTM
Failure to “cut to air”; cannulation of the subcutaneous space instead of trachea
Delay or avoidance of the procedure due to its perceived undesirability or lack of confidence
Inability of a 68W to reach the patient
Additionally, only 1 in 40 soldiers is a 68W, and some units may enter combat without a 68W. These problems could be solved if a simplified, intuitive, dependable cricothyrotomy device was available to more personnel.
*Courtesy of Dr. James Gilman, Antonio Spina, Michael Good, Qiuyin Ren, Ryan Walter, and Travis Wallace
Please complete the following form to submit a project: